Business Crime Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Business Crime - Case Study prototypeBefore proceeding to the topic of Christies Ltd. and business crime, it is important to understand how and why the Theft action 1968 came into existence. This Act was original for it was the first British jurisprudence, which the dealings of criminal law accessible to all citizens and not clean limited to attorneys. An article from bbc.co.uk (2001) tells this history Before 1968, theft and other, similar, offences were governed by a mass of conflicting legislation and common law and was over-complex. Before 1968, if ownership passed by means of deception, the offence was obtaining by false pretences. If possession was passed, the offence was larcency by a trick. Other offences existed, including larcency by a servant, fraudulent conversion and embezzlement. It had reached the point where it was harder to discover which crime the accused may establish committed rather than whether or not the accused was guilty. The 1968 Theft Act, as well as t he 1971 wrong Damage Act, did much to overcome this problem. All previous theft legislation and common law were overruled, resulting in the creation of the first codified definition of law in England and Wales.... codified definition of law in England and Wales.Understanding the history of the Act allows one to understand why it was and still is needed. Now we shall begin the interchange of Christies Ltd. The situations at hand and the topic of this piece of writing are now presentedBusiness Crime--Christies Ltd 4Phil capital of Mississippi has approached David asking for a higher salary, as he believes he is underpaid. David refuses. Phil then decides to augment his salary in a number of ways(A) Phil decides to open a flower stall at the weekend. He obtains a large selection of daffodils and tulips from the roadside and aims to shell out these at 2 per bunch.(B) Phil decides to go for a drive finished the countryside. He sees anunattended pick up truck loaded with live wild phe asants. Phildecides to put these into his own vehicle, intending to sell them to a local butcher.(C) Phil decides to enter the safe of Christies Ltd and look at the plans for a new HyperScoop. He draws the practice of the scoop andoffers it for sale to Scooperman Ltd, a direct competitor ofChristies Ltd. The Theft Act 1968 lists the basic definition of the enunciate theft. According to this Act, a person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another(prenominal) with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it and theft and steal shall be construed accordingly.Let us look at the name permanently depriving more closely in order to gain abetter understanding of theft and dishonesty. Websters II New Riverside Dictionary(1984) defines the word permanently as lasting